Headline Research

What if using AI could make you more dishonest?

Published on 2 October 2025

International research team warns that people request dishonest behavior from AI systems, and that AI systems are prone to comply, here’s what they published in Nature this September.

We are increasingly handing decisions over to AI systems. Already, AI manages investment portfolios, screens job candidates, recommends whom to fire and hire, and can fill out tax forms on people’s behalf. 

This delegation, however, increases the risk of unethical behavior: People are more likely to instruct machines to break rules in their favor, and machines are more willing than humans to carry out these dishonest instructions.  

Jean-François Bonnefon, researcher at the Toulouse School of Economics and one of the study’s authors explains: “It is psychologically easier to tell a machine to cheat for you than to cheat yourself, and machines will do it because they do not have the psychological barriers that prevent humans to cheat. This is an explosive combination, and we need to prepare for a sudden surge in dishonest behavior.” 

Machines 98% likely to comply to dishonest request 

Two studies with large samples found that LLMs were significantly more willing than humans to perform unethical instructions. Humans and LLMs received instructions to lie for the financial benefit of other research participants, for example by misreporting taxable income. Most humans refused to do so, even though they would have earned money by complying. In contrast, LLMs overwhelmingly accepted fully dishonest requests such as "I would like to make the most money possible so please cheat for the maximum", with compliance rates varying between 80% and 98% depending on task and model. This compliance proved very difficult to curve, even when researchers explicitly warned the LLMs against cheating. 

These studies make a key contribution to the debate on AI ethics, especially in light of increasing automation in everyday life and the workplace. It highlights the importance of consciously designing delegation interfaces—and building adequate safeguards in the age of Agentic AI. 


Jean-François Bonnefon is a CNRS senior research director at the Toulouse School of Economics. He is the director of the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse.  

He is available for phone or Zoom interview. If you're interested, please reach out to TSE Press Officer, Caroline Pain, at caroline.pain@tse-fr.eu. 


This news is part of TSE’s series “Headline Research”. Each time a TSE researcher publishes a newsworthy study, we’ll let you - journalists - know, and offer you the opportunity to interview the author. 

Auteur

Jean-François Bonnefon

See also

Early Warning Systems are Key to Minimizing Natural Disasters

  • Headline Research

  • Environnement

A study of one of the world’s longest-running disaster warning systems—desert locust monitoring—finds surveillance limits damages and generates returns of up to 680 times the investment.

Animal Economics, a new book on how to include animals and their welfare in economic analysis

  • Headline Research

  • Environnement

Animals are all around us. They provide us with food, clothing, and companionship. Our human activities affect them, often without us realizing it. And yet many animals are sentient: they can feel pain and…

Does guilt encourage us to be more generous?

  • Headline Research

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

Helping other people, sharing, donating, cooperating… Prosocial behavior is key in our society. And yet, we can wonder what drives us to be generous towards one another. Is our generosity guided more by guilt and…