Article

Universal Intellectual Property Rights: Too Much of a Good Thing?

Emmanuelle Auriol, Sara Biancini, and Rodrigo Paillacar

Abstract

Developing countries' incentives to protect intellectual property rights (IPR) are studied in a model of vertical innovation. Enforcing IPR boosts export opportunities to advanced economies but slows down technological transfers and incentives to invest in R&D. Asymmetric protection of IPR, strict in the North and lax in the South, leads in many cases to a higher world level of innovation than universal enforcement. IPR enforcement is U-shaped in the relative size of the export market compared to the domestic one: rich countries and small/poor countries enforce IPR, the former to protect their innovations, the latter to access foreign markets, while large emerging countries free-ride on rich countries' technology to serve their internal demand.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Rights; Innovation; Imitation; Duopoly; Developing Countries;

JEL codes

  • F12: Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies • Fragmentation
  • F13: Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations
  • F15: Economic Integration
  • L13: Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
  • O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
  • O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

Reference

Emmanuelle Auriol, Sara Biancini, and Rodrigo Paillacar, Universal Intellectual Property Rights: Too Much of a Good Thing?, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 65, July 2019, pp. 51–81.

Published in

International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 65, July 2019, pp. 51–81