Article

Trends in Author-Reported Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in the United States from 1995 to 2018: Implications for Discount Rates

Ankur Pandya, Mike Paulden, Jinyi Zhu, Tara A. Lavelle, and James K. Hammitt

Error message

Access denied. You must log in to view this page.

Abstract

Background: Decisions based on cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) using equal discount rates for health and cost outcomes are consistent with using a constant cost-effectiveness threshold over time. We sought to analyze trends in author-reported cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) thresholds from CEAs published for the US setting over 24 y to retrospectively assess whether the recommended equal discount rates for costs and health were consistent with trends in the CEA literature. Methods: We used the Tufts CEA Registry to assess whether author-reported cost-effectiveness thresholds changed in CEAs published for the US setting between 1995 and 2018 and back-calculated the implied discount rate for health based on these trends for inflation-adjusted cost-effectiveness thresholds and an annual discount rate for costs of 3%.

Reference

Ankur Pandya, Mike Paulden, Jinyi Zhu, Tara A. Lavelle, and James K. Hammitt, Trends in Author-Reported Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in the United States from 1995 to 2018: Implications for Discount Rates, Medical Decision Making, vol. 42, n. 7, October 2022, pp. 885–892.

Published in

Medical Decision Making, vol. 42, n. 7, October 2022, pp. 885–892