Article

Guilt drives prosociality across 20 countries

Catherine Molho, Ivan Soraperra, Jonathan Schulz, and Shaul Shalvi

Abstract

Impersonal prosociality is considered a cornerstone of thriving civic societies and well-functioning institutions. Previous research has documented cross-societal variation in prosociality using monetary allocation tasks such as dictator games. Here we examined whether different societies may rely on distinct mechanisms—guilt and internalized norms versus shame and external reputation—to promote prosociality. We conducted a preregistered experiment with 7,978 participants across 20 culturally diverse countries. In dictator games, we manipulated guilt by varying information about the consequences of participants’ decisions, and shame by varying observability. We also used individual- and country-level measures of the importance of guilt over shame. We found robust evidence for guilt-driven prosociality and wilful ignorance across countries. Prosociality was higher when individuals received information than when they could avoid it. Furthermore, more guilt-prone individuals (but not countries) were more responsive to information. In contrast, observability by strangers had negligible effects on prosociality. Our findings highlight the importance of providing information about the negative consequences of individuals’ choices to encourage prosocial behaviour across cultural contexts.

Keywords

Cultural evolution; Economics; Human behaviour;

Reference

Catherine Molho, Ivan Soraperra, Jonathan Schulz, and Shaul Shalvi, Guilt drives prosociality across 20 countries, Nature Human Behaviour, August 2025.

See also

Published in

Nature Human Behaviour, August 2025