Résumé
This paper explores an information intervention designed and implemented within a school assignment mechanism in Mexico City. Through a randomized experiment, we show that providing a subset of applicants with feedback about their academic performance can enhance sorting by skill across high school tracks. We embed the experimental variation into an empirical model of schooling choice and outcomes to assess the impact of the intervention for the overall population of applicants. Feedback provision is shown to increase the eciency of the student-school allocation, while congestion externalities are detrimental for the equity of downstream education outcomes.
Mots-clés
Informations; Attentes subjectives; Mise à jour des croyances; Croyances biaisées; Choix de l'établissement scolaire; Modèles de choix discrets; Fonction de contrôle; Appariement stable;
Codes JEL
- D83: Search • Learning • Information and Knowledge • Communication • Belief
- I21: Analysis of Education
- I24: Education and Inequality
- J24: Human Capital • Skills • Occupational Choice • Labor Productivity
Remplace
Matteo Bobba, Veronica Frisancho et Marco Pariguana, « Perceived Ability and School Choices: Experimental Evidence and Scale-up Effects », TSE Working Paper, n° 16-660, juin 2016, révision mars 2026.
Référence
Matteo Bobba, Veronica Frisancho et Marco Pariguana, « Perceived Ability and School Choices: Experimental Evidence and Scale-up Effects », Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 2026, à paraître.
Publié dans
Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 2026, à paraître
