Résumé
A labeling system for green gases, such as green hydrogen and bio-methane, could enable retailers to leverage consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental quality while promoting the adoption of these cleaner alternatives. However, the significant cost gap between green and conventional gases raises concerns about the efficacy of such a label, particularly in markets with complex value chains such as road transportation. We develop a stylized model of a gas-based road transport market to evaluate whether the market’s organization could be as efficient as a labeling policy when consumers lack direct information about production methods. With the label, producers prefer to exploit the double marginalization to the detriment of social welfare. However, this allows the high-quality producer to cover its fixed costs. Producers can use vertical restraints to convey quality information to consumers without the label. The informational problem creates a trade-off between the intensity of competition (driven by perceived qualities) and cost efficiency. Implementing an optimal label policy depends on the cost gap between qualities and consumers’ expectations about the share of green gas in the market. Under the current cost gap, if consumers were to be informed about the current production landscape, it is possible that their beliefs would lean towards a relatively pessimistic view. In such a case, the label would be socially optimal.
Mots-clés
Label; Vertical Restraints; Innovation; Green Gases;
Codes JEL
- L13: Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
- L15: Information and Product Quality • Standardization and Compatibility
- L42: Vertical Restraints • Resale Price Maintenance • Quantity Discounts
- Q42: Alternative Energy Sources
Référence
Sai Bravo-Melgarejo et Carole Haritchabalet, « A model of vertical restraints and labeling: the case of green gases », Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2025, à paraître.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2025, à paraître